Hunder Assault

I know I am better. But this is all you deserve

don't just delete posts that make you look bad JV

you have to learn to take the good with the bad, its part of life

I do not usually follow Pro-Decklist, or anything of these sorts. But after reading this, I must agree with Gremlin. This layout is poorly made and executed. I have no problem with the deck since I already know how to play Hunders. But Grem brings up a good point, all you're doing is restating the card's effect.

I would have rather have a more in-depth explanation of card reasons and such.

And at Tylaxe, Grem is right, if you actually did read it you can see, the execution of the write up the deck is poorly made. If you actually have seen other Pro-decklists they have in-depth talk about the cards and combos and of the deck it's self.

This is just a reiteration of card effects with a 3 sentence explanation of a deck, with no explanation or evaluation.

Jv there's really no point of arguing with 3 other members that are dis-satisfied with your work. Just on the next take some advice given and give what they deserve.

have you considered adding in a shapesnatch and trent engine, with swing of memories,summoners art, and silent doom/birthright?

Mr.Kandy wrote:

I do not usually follow Pro-Decklist, or anything of these sorts. But after reading this, I must agree with Gremlin. This layout is poorly made and executed. I have no problem with the deck since I already know how to play Hunders. But Grem brings up a good point, all you're doing is restating the card's effect.

I would have rather have a more in-depth explanation of card reasons and such.

And at Tylaxe, Grem is right, if you actually did read it you can see, the execution of the write up the deck is poorly made. If you actually have seen other Pro-decklists they have in-depth talk about the cards and combos and of the deck it's self.

This is just a reiteration of card effects with a 3 sentence explanation of a deck, with no explanation or evaluation.

Jv there's really no point of arguing with 3 other members that are dis-satisfied with your work. Just on the next take some advice given and give what they deserve.

I was very lazy when I did this :V mine others are more deep. but this actually is simple, the Hunders doesn't need explanation since all have the same effect and the others are just TECH as I said.

Zeox wrote:

have you considered adding in a shapesnatch and trent engine, with swing of memories,summoners art, and silent doom/birthright?

shapesnatch and trent too strong for this Deck. If I add them no one will face me. you know the fear.

Mr.Kandy wrote:

I do not usually follow Pro-Decklist, or anything of these sorts. But after reading this, I must agree with Gremlin. This layout is poorly made and executed. I have no problem with the deck since I already know how to play Hunders. But Grem brings up a good point, all you're doing is restating the card's effect.

I would have rather have a more in-depth explanation of card reasons and such.

And at Tylaxe, Grem is right, if you actually did read it you can see, the execution of the write up the deck is poorly made. If you actually have seen other Pro-decklists they have in-depth talk about the cards and combos and of the deck it's self.

This is just a reiteration of card effects with a 3 sentence explanation of a deck, with no explanation or evaluation.

Jv there's really no point of arguing with 3 other members that are dis-satisfied with your work. Just on the next take some advice given and give what they deserve.

Gremlin's right, gg no re
Its too simple, need some deep stuff