Duel Academy
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Duel Academy Log in

Get your game on!


[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

power_settings_newLogin to reply
+16
PaNiCMaKeRz
CrimsonOverlord
Lux
BlackJack
YAMI MOTO#1
DanelerH
username290
JC the shadow hunter
llVllyth
Aannax
psychoturtle
Centrik
Drunkion
DDS
Staxx
Yata|Of|Garatsuu
20 posters

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 Empty[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
First topic message reminder :

[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 12383265
Greetings duelists. RA4EVA gang is taking over Obelisk Blue and Slifer Red but they ain't giving up without a fight. Let's get to the thing.


Rules: 
-TCG
-Best out of 3 match
-Burn, Mill, Stall, First Turn Kill or any Win Condition decks are banned!
-"RA4EVA" gang challenges for duels. 
-No deck lock
-When Obelisk/Slifer duelist loses to RA4EVA duelist, the latter duelist may challenge any particitaping duelist and they have 72 hours to respond to the duel. Of course, any legimate reason for not dueling is accepted.
-Once you ran out of hearts you are out
- No answer within 72 hours of a challenge from a gang member results in loss of a heart


Now...let me introduce you to the teams!


RA4EVA Gang (6):  
Powernova
Lux
Centrik
JC the shadow hunter

 

Team Mascott: 
[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 2Q==
Obelisk Blue (15): 
CrimsonOverlord
Drunkion
Pepchoninga
psychoturtle
Kangaroo-Jolty




Slifer Red (14):
 PaNiCMaKeRz
"Yata|Of|Garatsuu"
DanelerH
Yami Moto#1
Reessiel
username290
llVllyth



Matches: 
Lux vs CrimsonOverlord = 0-2
Lux vs DanelerH = 1-2
Lux vs Reessiel = 0-2
BlackJack vs Reessiel = 2-1
Powernova vs CrimsonOverlord = 1-2
BlackJack vs CrimsonOverlord ) 1-2
BlackJack vs PaNiCMaKeRz ) 0-2
BlackJack vs Pepchoninga = 0-2
JC the shadow hunter vs pyschoturtle
JC the shadow hunter vs CrimsonOverlord = 1-2
PowerNova vs CrimsonOverlord = 1-2
PowerNova vs PaNiCMaKeRz = 0-2
PowerNova vs Kangaroo-Jolty  = 0-2


Last edited by Lux on Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:44 am; edited 19 times in total

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Tcg and ocg is what I would prefer.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
tcg ocg is my preferred choice

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I think the event host has the right to set up the rules. If TCG only is his choice, or TCG + OCG, we have no right to object. (OCG would be ridiculous though as it interferes with banlists)

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I honestly don't mind in a war setting, I'm game for either, but I do agree with you @psychoturtle pertaining to banlists. We'd have to switch to a Worlds Banlist to properly utilize TCG+OCG imo.

I may be co-hosting, but ultimately you'll need to make the call as Staff @Lux

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I just made the best hero deck and it uses ocg , I CRAVE TO SHOW IT. But yea do watever u want.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I really want use my newest weird deck and I am not entirely sure if it is tcg

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Aannax wrote:
I really want use my newest weird deck and I am not entirely sure if it is tcg

same

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I find switch to Worlds banlist more disturbing than using TCG only. OCG is also out of many players reach, including myself, as we cannot keep up with it.

Just go with it.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
This didn't make much sence but oh well [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 3974120512 

Also @CrimsonOverlord duel me with that deck when you can I wanna see how you utilize the new support [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 3974120512

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Well, in short then, it's my decision and I won't change it.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Well it should be the players decision as this affects us more then you, but I do belive that in this case TCG is the easiest way and there is no need for overcomplicating it. 

So, when are we gonna start this shit?

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Pepchoninga wrote:
Well it should be the players decision as this affects us more then you, but I do belive that in this case TCG is the easiest way and there is no need for overcomplicating it. 

So, when are we gonna start this shit?

Not everyone here is in touch with OCG, but I'm pretty sure that everyone is in touch with TCG. Can my decision be respected for once?

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Yeah sure why not.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
How about we just make a straw poll.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Honestly I think we should do what Lux said since he is HOSTING the even and has gone through th trouble to set it all up.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
just lets duel

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
if you want ocg too ban some super op shit that isnt out in tcg yet like lawnmoaning.. you definetely dont 
wanna see me milling 57 infernoids first turn

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Yeah but bannin Stuff will only make it harder. OCG is pretty full of things that could potentially be overpowered, so there is always gonna be one that is using ine of these things anand is bitching about it (myself included.). Limiting it to TCG will just eliminate this problem as really we don't have a deck that is clearly better then others.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Lmao as if abc is totally balanced, at least ocg is creative

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
ABC is not overpowered. Actually it is more then achievable to beat the deck.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Pepchoninga wrote:
ABC is not overpowered. Actually it is more then achievable to beat the deck.


without maining side cards it's very difficult to beat them game 1 of a match

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
I'll leave sign-ups open until 2morow, then we start.

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
put me in for RA

and someone give me a ygopro link so I can wreck people without even having any recent knowledge of the game Razz

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Alright ill join then, blue!

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
JC the shadow hunter wrote:
put me in for RA

and someone give me a ygopro link so I can wreck people without even having any recent knowledge of the game Razz

Here, hopefully this will help ^^

http://www.duelacademy.net/t48406-godly-guide-for-downloading-ygopro

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
JC the shadow hunter wrote:
put me in for RA

and someone give me a ygopro link so I can wreck people without even having any recent knowledge of the game Razz


[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 6494d9a65195279d35717e6d97375037c34660e076011dc05bcc67011a212df0

@Lux For each new participant, make sure to use my calculation to ensure heart count is correct. If it ends up being x.5, round up to the next whole nuber (14.5 goes to 15)

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Pepchoninga wrote:
psychoturtle wrote:
Pepchoninga wrote:
ABC is not overpowered. Actually it is more then achievable to beat the deck.


without maining side cards it's very difficult to beat them game 1 of a match

They might be consistent, but they also have some of the worst bricks in the game currently. Also really it's more then easy to side against them. Dragon buster dies to hand traps like Ghost Ogre and Snow and the other dude that terminates it from the game completely.

Any deck dies to proper siding, how is that an argument lol, same with the brick theory. ABC is not okish, its a top deck, but ye idc i just said tcg has the top champs there too

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Kangaroo-Jolty wrote:
Alright ill join then, blue!


who are you?

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Im assuming everyone will use ygopro?

or ygopro 2?

or nexus? 

e.e

and ty pep

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
Ygopro, we say this 100000 times, its even in the op lmao

description[Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk - Page 3 EmptyRe: [Event] RA4EVA vs Slifer/Obelisk

more_horiz
privacy_tip Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
power_settings_newLogin to reply