June Pro Decklist Tournament [Finished]

MetaphysHunter wrote:

Why is necro face limmited and semi-limmited

Lavi~ wrote:

DA Name : Lavi~
DN Name : Nyagisa~
GMT + 10

Decklist : 

DanelerH wrote:

I don't actually know if this is considered anti-meta or not.  It's a control deck and it's not listed under the decks we aren't allowed to use, but I'll understand if I'm not allowed to use it.  I'll just use a different deck if this occurs.

DA Name:  DanelerH
Dueling Network\Ygochrome\Ygopro\Devpro Name:  DanelerH (for all of them
Time Zone:  (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US $ Canada)
Pro Decklist Image Link:  Senet

Side note:  Because of the zone selection, this deck works best on automatic platforms, but it can also work on DN.  I will just fill my field with tokens and just remove them when placing a card.  The opponent can do this, too.  The only issue this would cause is for Xyz summoning, as that could potentially involve moving several cards/tokens.

CrimsonOverlord wrote:

DanelerH wrote:

I don't actually know if this is considered anti-meta or not.  It's a control deck and it's not listed under the decks we aren't allowed to use, but I'll understand if I'm not allowed to use it.  I'll just use a different deck if this occurs.

DA Name:  DanelerH
Dueling Network\Ygochrome\Ygopro\Devpro Name:  DanelerH (for all of them
Time Zone:  (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US $ Canada)
Pro Decklist Image Link:  Senet

Side note:  Because of the zone selection, this deck works best on automatic platforms, but it can also work on DN.  I will just fill my field with tokens and just remove them when placing a card.  The opponent can do this, too.  The only issue this would cause is for Xyz summoning, as that could potentially involve moving several cards/tokens.

With all the zone blockage and whatnot i think its anti meta? I mean i can see the purpose of it being blocking off opponent until you set off. Would you mind if i asked you to send another list?

CrimsonOverlord wrote:

I mean i could be wrong. Still id like some clarification on them. I really dunno about them too much to give my thoughts

ScottyAdams wrote:

CrimsonOverlord wrote:

I mean i could be wrong. Still id like some clarification on them. I really dunno about them too much to give my thoughts

Basically, they work in regards to columns, and each turn, the monsters are allowed to move to an unoccupied monster card zone (and the support cards are related to whatever column the card is in or whatever, as well as the monsters having effects related to the column they are in). The whole 'unable to use said monster card zone' part comes from cards like Ninjitsu art of Shadow Sealing, Spacial collapse and whatnot. The opponent is able to play as per usual.

DanelerH wrote:

ScottyAdams wrote:

CrimsonOverlord wrote:

I mean i could be wrong. Still id like some clarification on them. I really dunno about them too much to give my thoughts

Basically, they work in regards to columns, and each turn, the monsters are allowed to move to an unoccupied monster card zone (and the support cards are related to whatever column the card is in or whatever, as well as the monsters having effects related to the column they are in). The whole 'unable to use said monster card zone' part comes from cards like Ninjitsu art of Shadow Sealing, Spacial collapse and whatnot. The opponent is able to play as per usual.

Well, the opponent is usually able to play as per usual.  Theoretically, I could get both Ground Collapse and a Wicked Zebra in my opening hand to block off all of the opponent's monster zones.

Crimson, it's not a problem if I have to create a different deck.  I'll do so.