Should Konami Errata Banned Cards?

Do you think Konami should bring iconic banned cards into legal play using an errata? Are you disappointed with the watered down effects that might ruin some of these cards' viability in official play?

Errata's should be purely for updating older cards with modern terminology and  PSCT or to clarify wording, because exact words matter when it comes to interpreting card interactions.

I believe then they should just make an expy of the card in question as a new card if they intend to 'address game breakers'  for official play in advanced format.

The process of changing cards makes previous formats, traditional and well.. literally anything other than standard advanced format infinitely more confusing then they need to be.

Roach wrote:

Do you think Konami should bring iconic banned cards into legal play using an errata? Are you disappointed with the watered down effects that might ruin some of these cards' viability in official play?

T-They already do...

DDS they did it. Look all those counterparts of Banned Cards. I prefer the ERRATA since you play iconic cards instead of have them for collection.

Jv wrote:

DDS they did it. Look all those counterparts of Banned Cards. I prefer the ERRATA since you play iconic cards instead of have them for collection.

I'm aware, my original post would be stating why I dislike them.

But I see your point. Albeit they are strictly 'in name only' as the counterparts have different effects.

I say no because they often ruin the card (take Crush Card as example)

Lux wrote:

I say no because they often ruin the card (take Crush Card as example)

...Crush Card is still really good

Linda-Senpai wrote:

Lux wrote:

I say no because they often ruin the card (take Crush Card as example)

...Crush Card is still really good

Crush card is good, but now can easily be used againist you in decks like lightsworn or burning abyss.