Duel Academy
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Duel Academy Log in

Get your game on!


description[SCD New] Number 95 Empty[SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
Number 95: Galaxy-Eyes Dark Matter Dragon


[SCD New] Number 95 Bb6d59f1



[SCD New] Number 95 300?cb=20141220083929


3 Level 9 monsters
You can also Xyz Summon this card by using 1 “Galaxy-Eyes” Xyz Monster you control as the Xyz Material. (Xyz Materials attached to that monster also become Xyz Materials on this card.) This card cannot be used as an Xyz Material. (1) When this card is Xyz Summoned: You can send 3 different Dragon-Type monsters from your Deck to the Graveyard; your opponent banishes 3 monsters from their Deck. (2) You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; during this turn, this card can make two attacks on monsters during each Battle Phase.


A new 4000 ATK Galaxy-eyes!

Last edited by Jv1391 on Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:59 pm; edited 1 time in total

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
Hard to summon easy to get rid off

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyDefault Title

more_horiz
Agreed, easy to destroy and hard to bring out. I dont like the effects much either... Its a mehh card on Konami's part.

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
It's seems you both haven't played Galaxy Deck yet.

Also you both too ignore the force of " you can also Xyz summon this card using a Galaxy-eyes Xz monster". No one will Summon it by 3 Level 9.

People will just rank-up a Galaxy-eyes.

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
k.den.

and yea i have played galaxy decks but not on a competitive level so i know nothing

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyDefault Title

more_horiz
Jv1391 wrote:
It's seems you both haven't played Galaxy Deck yet.
Also you both too ignore the force of " you can also Xyz summon this card using a Galaxy-eyes Xyz monster". No one will Summon it by 3 Level 9.
People will just rank-up a Galaxy-eyes.

But that's really about 3 cards for this guy either way (2 materials + the XYZ).  He's decent for the effort I suppose (4000 ATK double attacker) but what can you use the triple foolish for in a Galaxy deck?

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
-Cannot stack Full Armor over it
-First eff is basically useless
-Second eff is alright.. but he can't even attack directly
gets a 5/10 from me

But on the bright side the artwork is pretty neat, looks like a deformed Dark Rebellion.

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
But you can stack Full Armor to summon it. also Galaxy Zero, Cloud Dragon = Summon a Galaxy Rank 8, overlay Full armor to clean then this to make a near OTK.

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
This card is a disgrace for a Galaxy Archetype -.-'

Why don't they stop making useless cards already?!

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
Because they do useless HERO cards to waste paper

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyDefault Title

more_horiz
Jv1391 wrote:
Because they do useless HERO cards to waste paper


Ladies and Gentlemen, DA's Obelisk Blue member...

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
Fusion SUmmon is Bad!

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/The_Academia

They killed Heartland and Yuma!

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyDefault Title

more_horiz
Jv1391 wrote:
Fusion SUmmon is Bad!

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/The_Academia

They killed Heartland and Yuma!


Fusion summon is not bad, you should blame Konami for making it look so but it's like you don't have any knowledge in this game -.-'

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
I like fusion summon boy :3 I played Hero since they came out :3

description[SCD New] Number 95 EmptyRe: [SCD New] Number 95

more_horiz
privacy_tip Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
power_settings_newLogin to reply