Deck originality 3/5: Some form of blue eyes dragons
Deck size: 0/5: 58 / 12
Siding skills: 0/5: No side
Use of cards: 0/5: Didn't use REDMD's effect when they could have. Didn't make any real plays.
Control of duel: 1/10: Made something that could be described as a counterplay, allbeit a not very effective one.
Rulings/misplays: 3/10: Nothing really came up for rulings. The games were pretty short. In terms of misplays, REDMD's effect was ignored and turn 2, no play was made at all when it was obvious that doing nothing would cause a loss. However, I'll give the benefit of the doubt on possible ruling knowledge.
Result of duel: 0/10: I won 2-0, within the first few turns.
Total score: 7/50
Welcome to slifer! If you want to rank up, you need to look at what makes a consistent deck, and how to use cards in combinations with each other.
Deck size: 0/5: 58 / 12
Siding skills: 0/5: No side
Use of cards: 0/5: Didn't use REDMD's effect when they could have. Didn't make any real plays.
Control of duel: 1/10: Made something that could be described as a counterplay, allbeit a not very effective one.
Rulings/misplays: 3/10: Nothing really came up for rulings. The games were pretty short. In terms of misplays, REDMD's effect was ignored and turn 2, no play was made at all when it was obvious that doing nothing would cause a loss. However, I'll give the benefit of the doubt on possible ruling knowledge.
Result of duel: 0/10: I won 2-0, within the first few turns.
Total score: 7/50
Welcome to slifer! If you want to rank up, you need to look at what makes a consistent deck, and how to use cards in combinations with each other.