Summary of Conjunction Functions

Ok, let us take it for short. I will go to the main point.

Do A, then do B: A needs to be resolved first, no A then no B. A can still be activated if B does not happen.

Do A, also do B: Happens silmutaneously and do everything that is possible.

Do A, and if you do, do B: "Timing" is like "Then" but "Causation" is the same as "Also". No A => No B. No B => A can still be activated.

Do A and B: Simultaneously but both are required. No A/B => Fail.

As I can remeber, right?

You have an idea for the next Rulings Lesson, Rate :D

Pretty much.

Will do so on Wednesday/Thursday.

Guessing from your wording, I believe this is correct. Except for the third one. If you do A, you must do B unless it says "you can." Something like that?

I missed one shame, but in general it's fine.
, I guess (._.")

@Rate also make one for colon and semi-colon too. Lots of people do not understand anything about PSCT.

Wait, do not lock thos yet, I still have questions to think out.

Triple post bs. Anybody give me an example about multiple conjuntives?

Yillion wrote:

@Rate also make one for colon and semi-colon too. Lots of people do not understand anything about PSCT.

Believe it or not I made a pretty decent blog about this. I was gonna write more but I got lazy and I was pretty sure I am the only one who has ever read it lol.

Can you and/or Irate take a peak at it to see if I understand the concept?

http://jikanreports.weebly.com/

I already have an article (actual article, not ruling lesson) about PSCT, you just need to scroll down the articles library a bit ._.

Also, first reminder about double/triple posting to Yillion u_u

It looks empty, Jik :O

Yillion wrote:

It looks empty, Jik :O

It is very empty. I made it within the span of two days and gave up on it.
I was just wondering if the content was correct.

EDIT:

When you say empty do you mean nothing is showing up? Or I just didn't write a lot? I didn't write much but there should be something.

Did not write much.

Since you want me to give you an example, ok Hope this is not in internet yet.

Stardust Dragon vs Grapha

Scenario: You have a nice Stardust on the field and it's your opponent's turn. Opponent uses Dark World Dealing, draws one card and sends Grapha to his/her Graveyard. Grapha's effect is now activated, targets Stardust and destroyes it. Can Stardust negate?

Answer: No. If you look at Stardust's effect clearly, it negates the activation AND destroys the card that just activated. According to the Confunction Junctions, if A/B fails, you can't do anything. So, back to the scenario, since Stardust can only negate because Grapha is already in the Graveyard, means that Stardust can't destroy Grapha also negate its effect. Stardust will be destroyed.

There you go, anymore to ask?

i confused :D

Something that people find complicated put into less than 50 words. Bravo ma'am.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODGA7ssL-6g

Too lazy, didn't click

schoolhouse rock is grammar land.

Explanation required?

It is a play about grammar and history. I watched the cartoon form when I was a child. That is where I learned grammar.

I learned grammar from English class and Kyo making fun of my grammar :/

Lol, go watch schoolhouse rock.