Amy Cool steps in to solve Chatbox issues?!

when is the poll gnna end i wanna see amy go "Pew Pew Pew"

Amy Cool wrote:

All the problematic kids click no because they know I'm gonna put an end to their chat career soon. But you know, eventually all admins will agree with me because what I'm gonna do is positive for DA and DA's Chatbox.

Or it could be because you're an egotist, and giving you absolute power completely eliminates the the need for other people to ever be in the chat. Disagreeing with something isn't evidence of guilt, fear, or wrongdoing.

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

All the problematic kids click no because they know I'm gonna put an end to their chat career soon. But you know, eventually all admins will agree with me because what I'm gonna do is positive for DA and DA's Chatbox.

Or it could be because you're an egotist, and giving you absolute power completely eliminates the the need for other people to ever be in the chat. Disagreeing with something isn't evidence of guilt, fear, or wrongdoing.

And what if I take my power from chat away? What would chat look like then? ::Monkey34::

The point is, when I share something with people and give it for free, then I expect at least that people do not abuse it, or how you language people like to say, do not use it in a proper way.

Amy Cool wrote:

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

All the problematic kids click no because they know I'm gonna put an end to their chat career soon. But you know, eventually all admins will agree with me because what I'm gonna do is positive for DA and DA's Chatbox.

Or it could be because you're an egotist, and giving you absolute power completely eliminates the the need for other people to ever be in the chat. Disagreeing with something isn't evidence of guilt, fear, or wrongdoing.

And what if I take my power from chat away? What would chat look like then?

The point is, when I share something with people and give it for free, then I expect at least that people do not abuse it, or how you language people like to say, do not use it in a proper way.

Although you might disagree, I've only witnessed a single staff member abuse his/ her "powers." There is no inherit need for a single person to siphon the abilities of everybody else and take it upon themselves to change every aspect of something that's wrong to how they see fit. How would you accomplish this? Banning every member until you have only a handful of people left? The reality is that there are only a few members who do anything wrong, and the situation is blown so out of proportion that people are believing that they sanction is being defiled in some manner, whether it be trolling, harassment, or whatever, but in fact it's sprouting from the fear of abuse. Not until recently has this been much of an issue, but immediately when new chat rules were suggested due to the actions of a select group of individuals, then more people began acting out. I don't know if they're opportunists or if it's some sort of defense mechanism, but the solution isn't severe punishment due to petty offenses, or threats of ban people for those same petty offenses. The solution is to systematically give specific individuals the chance to redeem themselves, and if that doesn't work out then you can ban them. I mean it's basically an example of the bystander effect, and the moment that you begin doing this everything will fall into place. The more you change the place into a hostile environment the worse people are going to react.

Last edited by Danica, the Great on Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:11 am; edited 2 times in total

I vote yes, but seriously. People at DA should be able to handle things themselves without Amy by now. But meh Amy always have control so "feudalist" go go go!

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

All the problematic kids click no because they know I'm gonna put an end to their chat career soon. But you know, eventually all admins will agree with me because what I'm gonna do is positive for DA and DA's Chatbox.

Or it could be because you're an egotist, and giving you absolute power completely eliminates the the need for other people to ever be in the chat. Disagreeing with something isn't evidence of guilt, fear, or wrongdoing.

And what if I take my power from chat away? What would chat look like then?

The point is, when I share something with people and give it for free, then I expect at least that people do not abuse it, or how you language people like to say, do not use it in a proper way.

Although you might disagree, I've only witnessed a single staff member abuse his/ her "powers." There is no inherit need for a single person to siphon the abilities of everybody else and take it upon themselves to change every aspect of something that's wrong to how they see fit. How would you accomplish this? Banning every member until you have only a handful of people left? The reality is that there are only a few members who do anything wrong, and the situation is blown so out of proportion that people are believing that they sanction is being defiled in some manner, whether it be trolling, harassment, or whatever, but in fact it's sprouting from the fear of abuse. Not until recently has this been much of an issue, but immediately when new chat rules were suggested due to the actions of a select group of individuals, then more people began acting out. I don't know if they're opportunists or if it's some sort of defense mechanism, but the solution isn't severe punishment due to petty offenses, or threats of ban people for those same petty offenses. The solution is to systematically give specific individuals the chance to redeem themselves, and if that doesn't work out then you can ban them. I mean it's basically an example of the bystander effect, and the moment that you begin doing this everything will fall into place. The more you change the place into a hostile environment the worse people are going to react.

Danica, Amy is a coder. She knows html css and javascript. With these combined skills you can do quite a bit with websites. My guess is that Amy is going to ban a bunch of words and be done with it. Who knows, maybe it's more complex than that. Plus, it's not up to you. This is a joke thread, just to let you all know it's going to get fixed. Don't waste the effort.

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

Danica, the Great wrote:

Amy Cool wrote:

All the problematic kids click no because they know I'm gonna put an end to their chat career soon. But you know, eventually all admins will agree with me because what I'm gonna do is positive for DA and DA's Chatbox.

Or it could be because you're an egotist, and giving you absolute power completely eliminates the the need for other people to ever be in the chat. Disagreeing with something isn't evidence of guilt, fear, or wrongdoing.

And what if I take my power from chat away? What would chat look like then?

The point is, when I share something with people and give it for free, then I expect at least that people do not abuse it, or how you language people like to say, do not use it in a proper way.

Although you might disagree, I've only witnessed a single staff member abuse his/ her "powers." There is no inherit need for a single person to siphon the abilities of everybody else and take it upon themselves to change every aspect of something that's wrong to how they see fit. How would you accomplish this? Banning every member until you have only a handful of people left? The reality is that there are only a few members who do anything wrong, and the situation is blown so out of proportion that people are believing that they sanction is being defiled in some manner, whether it be trolling, harassment, or whatever, but in fact it's sprouting from the fear of abuse. Not until recently has this been much of an issue, but immediately when new chat rules were suggested due to the actions of a select group of individuals, then more people began acting out. I don't know if they're opportunists or if it's some sort of defense mechanism, but the solution isn't severe punishment due to petty offenses, or threats of ban people for those same petty offenses. The solution is to systematically give specific individuals the chance to redeem themselves, and if that doesn't work out then you can ban them. I mean it's basically an example of the bystander effect, and the moment that you begin doing this everything will fall into place. The more you change the place into a hostile environment the worse people are going to react.

lol what is with all these serious posts like you are writing to a president obama ._.


Anyway, you have a reasonable thought about this all, I respect that. However, thing you are missing like most people here is when you predict what I will do, I mean how do you know what my actions are going to be? You can't know that, especially not my actions because they always differ from most people here. They way you described I would use there, is the way some 15 yrs old kid would do it. When I play a game, the people have choices, but they always choose the one I want them to choose


AND THANK YOU DEX! <3 You are one of the few that has seen the true nature of my act with this post

I speak this way because I choose not to lower myself to appeal to the standard or norms of other people. Not like it's a bad thing, but it's what I do.

Anyway, I didn't mean to sound like I implied that your first actions would be to ban people, but it's a popular trend lately, and it was mostly a rhetoric on that, as well as a legitimate question.

Don't question Amy pls

I think I won't elect an answer until I know what Amy plans to do. Just like I didnt vote for Obama and Romney because I don't know what they could do, I won't vote here either lol

I would vote Amy without reason, simply because she's Amy.

She has my full support in every regard, by the way. Well, nearly every.

I would vote for Obama simply because I wouldn't for Romney.

It's as if we have to decide between a good thing and a bad thing.

Irate God wrote:

I would vote Amy without reason, simply because she's Amy.

That's really a terrible method of decision making.

Do I look like I care about how I make my decisions?

I know Amy, since why I instantly voted Yes without thinking much.

what chat issues?

Apparently you don't care. That's blind allegiance, but if that's what you want.

Actually there's one issue that has to be solved.Make bulgarian 2nd official language in da chat already.Thank you.

chat issues still aint solved. I got harrassed like hell last night, and not damn thing was done. I'll just bet if any1 else was in my shoes, several people would've been banned.

Yes, Danica, it probably is.

But, as I mentioned before, I don't care as long as it's Amy.

Also, this is a toke jopic.

pure wiN wrote:

chat issues still aint solved. I got harrassed like hell last night, and not damn thing was done. I'll just bet if any1 else was in my shoes, several people would've been banned.

maybe you should stop pretending to be a female? lol IJS

Dude id vote yes even if they all said no ._.

Chatbox Rules dont apply to Chaos Kush

Staxx M. Lawlstogmer wrote:

Chatbox Rules dont apply to Chaos Kush

This.

Nuran wrote:

Staxx M. Lawlstogmer wrote:

Chatbox Rules dont apply to Chaos Kush

This.

OBJECTION!!

Irate God wrote:

Nuran wrote:

Staxx M. Lawlstogmer wrote:

Chatbox Rules dont apply to Chaos Kush

This.

OBJECTION!!

overruled.

I never was comfortable with you speaking of yourself in third person.



I said this before and i'll say it again, and don't make me say it for a third time. We had a poll for the chat box, the majority voted FOR the chat box new rules, that cut it off.



Now, simple question:

- Why there is so many conflicts on DA Chatbox?

Answer: There is 4 kind of people in DA.

1. People wants to be respected.

2. People wants to be noticed.

3. People wants to have fun.

4. People whom seek all above.



Am for myself, i don't give a damn sh*t about Respect, or notice-ability, i come to DA everyday to have fun, not to have another "Real-Virtual life". If people come here to gain respect, then go find it somewhere else.

Not saying what you are mighe be thinking of right now, there is respect in DA, and chance to be noticed if you are not someone a "somewhat-known" around even tho that doesn't matter for some people.



Adding more restrictions to the chatbox is something am against and always will be. Folks, am from iraq, and i live in syria. Believe me when i say I DON'T WANT MORE RESTRICTIONS IN MY LIFE!

Am not despirate of course, it's just my auto-corrector is broken so am worried about my spelling, ikr?!



So, i'll cut it off here. First, this topic should have been discussed before it's posted, because it confilcts with the current DA rules. Second, doesn't matter the result of those poll, we already had a similar one days ago. Third, am not the sort of people that adulate girls just because they are girls, so don't take any of this personal no matter what, i'll continue to do my job with the other staff members to make this place better, you can sit back and watch.



One last thing, I really dislike how some people keep saying awful things about DA the whole time just because they can, or perhaps because they want to ruin this place reputation. There is new rules comming out in new days that will make DA a little bit more organized that it is with less restrictions.



~Anxo-sama x.x

"despirate"

P_________________P!!!!!!!!1!!11!11

Anyways, the whole thing this topic is based on is a joke, Anzo.

Also, where the f*ck have you been for the last 3 days? e.e

Anzo dnt think its a joke p.p

having tard staff is the true issue.Srsly make bulgarian official language already cuz it gets annoyin.

@Irate: Check admins section e.e

@Nuran: who cares o.O

Mista Anzo wrote:

One last thing, I really dislike how some people keep saying awful things about DA the whole time just because they can, or perhaps because they want to ruin this place reputation. There is new rules comming out in new days that will make DA a little bit more organized that it is with less restrictions.



~Anxo-sama x.x

If you read it carefully... we're telling you the things that need to be improved... I don't see why staff are saying we're saying BS about DA or We're disrespecting DA or We're giving a bad rep to DA... NO. We're not. What we ARE doing is telling YOU, the admins, what US, the members, Want.


-facepalm-